Shell is bringing fracking to Egypt, threatening the North African country’s already limited water resources.
The company is using hydraulic fracturing technology to drill three wells in Egypt’s Western Desert, in the Alam El Shawish West concession. Concerned that scarce water resources will be poisoned, the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) has condemned the introduction of fracking to Egypt and demanded an immediate moratorium.
Fracking faces global opposition for its use of toxic and carcinogenic chemicals which seep into the groundwater, climate change impacts and its role in causing earthquakes (e.g. England and the US – as high as 4.0 on the Richter scale). As a result, the technology is currently banned or under moratorium in countries and states including France, Bulgaria, New York and Vermont.
Shell itself is already under fire for its fracking operations & plans in South Africa, Pennsylvania and New Mexico – for contaminating drinking water, applying heavy pressure to local politics and lobbying aggressively. In South Africa, the company ran misleading adverts to cover up the impacts of fracking – leading the Advertising Standards Authority to demand that their removal.
Back in Egypt, despite Shell having fracked at least one of its wells at Alam El Shawish West, the Egyptian Agency for Environmental Affairs says it has yet to receive Shell’s environmental impact assessment for the fracking operation – a necessary precondition for any drilling. Local freshwater aquifers are being placed at risk by Shell’s drive to accelerate extraction rates.
Reem Labib, EIPR‘s Environmental Justice Researcher, explained that: “Fracking threatens Egypt’s drinking water, but Shell and Dana’s drilling is mired in secrecy. We don’t know the ingredients in the toxic cocktail used, where they plan to source water from, or how the poisonous slurry will be disposed of. The government hasn’t published any regulations specific to fracking, the local geological conditions, or how and whether it will monitor and evaluate the impacts of fracking.”
Further investigation reveals that Shell aren’t the first to frack in Egypt. As well as US-based Apache, Dana Gas are fracking in the Nile Valley itself. The West Al-Baraka-2 well is near Kom Ombo in southern Egypt – just downstream of the Aswan Dam. Leakage of the toxic fracking cocktail could result in poisonous chemicals flowing into the Nile – threatening the lives and livelihoods of the 70 million people who are clustered along the river downstream.
In a brief released today (in Arabic), EIPR outlines how fracking operations threaten water resources critical to Egypt’s wellbeing. Fracking near Kom Ombo raises fears that toxic chemicals could leak into the Nile, threatening the lives and livelihoods of those downriver. While the Western Desert contains essential aquifer systems of fresh groundwater on which all agriculture by the inhabitants of the western oases depend. While groundwater contamination is the most immediate threat of fracking, it also uses major quantities of water: Fracking a single well uses more than an Egyptian consumes across 35-52 years.
There are currently no specific rules and regulations governing the use of fracking in Egypt. EIPR has called on the Egyptian government to place an immediate moratorium on fracking, at the very least until appropriate regulation has been developed and comprehensive independent scientific studies have assessed the potential effects based on local geology, including the possibility of fracking chemicals leaking into the groundwater. The organisation has also calls on Shell, Dana Petroleum, Apache and any other companies that frack to publish the chemical components used and processes of treatment and disposal.












1 Comment
We cannot trust the Government, the regulators nor the frackers themselves. History has proved this time and time again. Nothing will ever change as far as this is concerned. So if you are pushing for better and proper regulation you are wasting your time. This is why Ive been campaigning for a total ban for the last couple of years. Having had six years previous experience in the N.Sea drilling industry, I have an advantage in understanding over the general public and this is why I dont focus entirely on the fracking itself here and now. Ever heard of failing well integrity? Hundreds of thousands of plugged and abandoned wells around the world are leaking. The drilling companies are long gone from those sites and nobody wants to take responsibility or cover the cost of trying to plug them for good. The reason is because its impossible to permanently seal off a well for good. When a well is drilled, casing is run and cemented in. The cement goes between the well bore and the outside of the casing. When the well is plugged and abandoned, the inside of the casing has aplugset into it and cement is pumped in on top. Once this is done there is no way of monitoring the well inside nor outside the casing to ensure the well is kept sealed. Do your own research and prepare to be very shocked. If you are against fracking for pollution reasons, it wont matter one iota how good the regulation is today or the next 20 years, these wells WILL fail in the future long after the frackers and their investors have made their millions and left the scene. Or not so long after. http://www.alkane.co.uk/ourcompany/alkane-news/44-5-april-2012-seven-star-biddulph-moor-approved-planning-permission If 7 Star had no interest in this site, how long do you think these wells would have remained unchecked and leaking and if spotted by a member of public, who do you think would have to foot the bill? The health and safety remains with the site not with Shell who are long gone. That means the local council would have to foot the bill to attempt an impossible fix. That means tax payers money down the drain. Each day hundreds of thousands of abandoned leaking oil wells and natural-gas wells spew toxic pollutants into the environment—and tens of millions more will soon join them—thanks to fatally flawed gas and oil-well capping and lax or nonexistent industry and government oversight. http://ecohearth.com/eco-zine/green-issues/1609-abandoned-leaking-oil-wells-natural-gas-well-leaks-disaster.html Just take a look at these next few links and then go on to do your own research, but don`t stop there. Do as I am doing and push for a complete ban, not just on fracking, but new deep sea projects. In fact, push for a ban on all hydrocarbon extraction and focus on clean renewable s. More than 27,000 abandoned oil and gas wells lurk in the hard rock beneath the Gulf of Mexico, an environmental minefield that has been ignored for decades. No one — not industry, not government — is checking to see if they are leaking, an Associated Press investigation shows. http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/27000-abandoned-oil-gas-wells-may-be-leaking-in-gulf-of-mexico.html A study of a gas field in Queensland, Australia has found 44% of gas wells leaking. The report adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that gas drilling inevitably leads to water contamination as gas escapes from boreholes. http://gasdrillinginbalcombe.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/44-of-wells-leaking-at-australian-gas-field/ Government reports have warned for decades that abandoned wells can provide pathways for oil, gas or brine-laden water to contaminate groundwater supplies or to travel up to the surface. Abandoned wells have polluted the drinking water source for Fort Knox, Ky., and leaked oil into water wells in Ohio and Michigan. Similar problems have occurred in Texas, New York, Colorado and other states where drilling has occurred. http://www.propublica.org/article/deteriorating-oil-and-gas-wells-threaten-drinking-water-homes-across-the-co Sorry if this is a bit of a long read, but proper research of the whole problem is required rather than just jumping on the fracking ban wagon. If these companies try to tell you that new technology can plug these fracked wells once all the oil or gas has been extracted, just refer them to all those wells that they drilled in the past that are leaking and need fixing. The cost of trying to fix a plugged and abandoned well is much more expensive than drilling the well in the first place. The existing cement and casing will need to be milled out and new plug pumped in. This is a total waste of money because there is no absolute guarantee of 100% well integrity in the future due to changes in underground formation pressures, corrosive elements, natural ground movements and even unforeseen faults that can rupture even the best plug and abandon job on the planet. Proper and adequate regulation on frack jobs today will NOT protect our future.